The Russian Axe chops at the foundation of America's financial system.
Russia's mobilization anticipates America's nuclear response.
“…the party most likely to use nuclear weapons first is the U.S. in order to save face and destabilize Russia once Ukraine is on the brink of collapse.” Jim Rickards: Has World War III Begun?
J.R. NYQUIST: “The Russian generals have a theory they’ve held in private. They call it “THE AXE THEORY” It’s the theory that, if you are going to war, you use your most terrible weapon first” Source
Mr. Nyquist believes that nuclear weapons make up the Russian Axe. I argue that Russia forged their Axe from fossil fuel energy. By launching the Special Military Operation now, the Russian Axe chops directly at the supply of energy to the Western importing nations, the very foundation of the Western financial system, at the system’s most vulnerable moment:
The American Fracking industry has flatlined and entered de-facto debtor in possession operations, and
OPEC total oil offered for sale has declined 35% in four years.
I also argue below that they have planned this for a long time.
To begin, Russia’s Special Military Operation has already created a global energy crisis.
IEA: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine leads to the first truly global energy crisis that will be felt for years.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has had a profound effect on global energy markets. Price volatility, supply shortages, security issues and economic uncertainty have contributed to what the International Energy Agency (IEA) is calling “the first truly global energy crisis, with impacts that will be felt for years to come”. Source
Remember that all of the effects listed below fall ON TOP of the loss of 35% of OPEC’s oil sales to the importing countries and the flatlining of Fracking.
Ukraine War reshaping the world.
As a result, inflation takes off….
Then interest rates skyrocket…
Does any evidence exist to suggest that Russia intended these effects? Again, J.R. Nyquist provides much evidence that Russia and China direct their War to destroy the west - economically -
Russia and China aim to destroy the west - economically -
LUDE: what they want to do is to bring down America, like what happened to the Soviet Union. When the Soviet Union collapsed there was no war. Not a drop of bloodshed; but the whole system just collapsed from within. They are trying to achieve this kind of effect in the U.S… Source
Using food, gas, and oil as weapons, Moscow would trigger economic shrinkage in the West. The Biden Administration would help this strategy along, shutting down oil pipelines and making “Big Oil” a pariah. The stage is now set for martial law and the revolutionary transformation of the American political system – exactly as Golitsyn predicted in 1984. The Gathering Storm: An Overview
Russia knows that severing any future increase in America’s fossil fuel energy supply will topple America’s financial system.
Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Witt of the Bundeswehr Transformation Center, part of the German Military put it this way in 2010:
“The developments shown here make it clear that it is essential to secure the supply of energy to the economic cycle - in - sufficient - quantities - to enable positive economic growth. A contraction in economic activity over an indefinite period of time represents a highly unstable state that will cause the system to collapse. It is hardly possible to estimate the security risks that such a development would involve.”
In addition to the German military, The Pentagon thought much the same, so did the British Military (p7). So did more that 20 government studies from around the world.
Why is this news to so many people in the West? Lt. Col Witt says it best:
“Psychological barriers cause indisputable facts to be blanked out and lead to almost instinctively refusing to look into this difficult subject in detail
Peak oil, however, is unavoidable.”
Lt. Col Witt on the fake fall of the Soviet Union…
Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Witt of the Bundeswehr Transformation Center suggests that Russia may have intentionally collapsed the Soviet Union in order to restrict their supply of oil because:
“Being aware of exceeding peak oil and in view of countries pursuing their own lasting advantages, there might be a deliberate restriction in supplies, for example, to preserve undeveloped oil resources” (p26, p2, )… “to establish themselves as newly emerging or reemerging regional or even global leading powers” p25, p2
So Soviet Union falls and Russian oil production tanks while the west steps on the gas pedal. Now, when the West’s gas tank runs dry, Russia steps on its gas pedal, with a very full tank, and steps on the worlds stage as a global leading power due to commodity strength and advanced military tech, including hypersonics.
…leading to the end of the US occupation of Europe?
Lead author Witt states clearly in this study that Germany should have three goals.
Gaining and keeping Moscow as partner, and
Developing a pan-European interdependent regional energy system.
Aim for equitable distribution among countries that have needed capabilities.
The US is not contiguous to Europe, and according to the logic of the study should focus on a pan North American energy region.
The US will compete with Eurasia for dwindling energy supplies, which will draw all sides into the slipstream of competition.
In that context, they need to consider how “Transatlantic security architectures could be adapted accordingly.”
“Energy independence means that a region, a state or a union of states can secure their energy supply with resources existing on their own territory or the territory of the union of states.” p47, p1
“an amicable agreement on - a - fair - distribution - mechanism for scarce resources could give rise to cooperation and conflict solutions, which, at best, could even have spillover effects on indivisible conflict subjects.” p62, p2
“The expansion of renewable energies implies the existence of extended energy regions that connect energy sources and consumers through transnational and partly transcontinental energy networks. This widens the expansion and the nature of critical infrastructures. In the future, this may not only involve the transport of renewable energy via power lines, but also transport infrastructures for solar- produced hydrogen or processed solid or gaseous biomass. Technologically, these infrastructures resemble those for fossil energy sources and are thus located in similar geographic regions. States with the ability to contribute to and benefit from such energy networks owing to their geographical, climatic or technological situation will strive for cooperation and integration options which may increasingly affect security policy.” p85, p2
“Gaining Moscow as a partner while achieving close energy interdependenceand considering an even tighter integration may prove to be decisive for the future of German and European supply security. p68, p3
“Relations among oil-importing countries would not be characterised by straight interdependences, but would … be … drawn even more into the slipstream of competition for limited resources (in this case, oil)…” p30, p5
“In this context, it may be necessary to consider whether and how the European and Transatlantic security architectures could be adapted accordingly.” p68, p3
Up fracking fast, down fracking fast.
Once America’s financial system goes, fracking follows a few years later.
Fracking resulted from US money printing. When US money priting stops, fracking suffers an almost immediate fatal heart attack. According to the OPEC montly oil report, fracking contributes
The resulting pyschological earthquake that will sweep over America (and Canada where I live) will result in the breakup of the US and Canada.
The NATO leaders are either suicidal or stupicidal. As economic devastation awaits the US if they cannot secure an increasing supply of energy, I predict that somehow or other the US will attempt to secure additional supplies from the Middle East. This will result in a horrifying loss of life on both sides, but the world will see America lose mililtary supremacy.
If, in desperation, as the collapse of America gains speed and visibility to America’s allies, America goes nuclear first, then at least two of Japan, France, and Germany will partipate in an annhilation attack on the US mainland.
“True, we are not quite there YET, but with the German Foreign Minister declaring that the EU is at war with Russia, and knowing that the EU is just a colonial administration, we are very, very close to a fullscale war between the US and Russia. What is even worse is that I don’t see how such a war could be avoided. I explained that in my recent post here. Simply put, there is *zero* chance of the US/NATO/EU victory, which means that the US Neocons will be faced by a stark choice: defeat or go nuclear (and even that won’t yield a victory for the United West).” US Neocons will be faced by a stark choice: defeat or go nuclear,
If you want to understand the world, you have to deal with real, actual facts. Dealing with emotionally laden facts requires real emotional intelligence and real strength. I purpose in these posts to present real, objective, mathematical facts to the people of the West in order to try to wake up my loved ones. Only after facing the ugly emotionally loaded facts of reality can my loved ones wake up and take Action.
The Reality of the War in Ukraine
Where is Russia more advantaged and NATO less advantaged than where they fight right now? Where, not on the territory of Russia, could Russia fight with shorter, better protected supply lines? Where could Russia fight with better allies on their flanks? Where could Russia fight with better aerospace, thermobaric, and electronic escalation dominance right at hand? Where could Russia fight with better C4ISR? Seriously, Where?
It appears to me that Russia has set up a killing field in front of their very mobile forces. As long as the West dribbles in under-trained men in outdated equipment, there will be no Russian offensive, because right now the West fights exactly as Russia would want them to.